Re: Indexing mail attachments & files inside Zip/tar.
- From: Veerapuram Varadhan <vvaradhan novell com>
- To: Michael Levy <mlevy wardium homeip net>
- Cc: dashboard-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Indexing mail attachments & files inside Zip/tar.
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:15:24 -0700
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 16:31 +0200, Michael Levy wrote:
> I'd thought about indexing the contents of archives a while ago
> and discussed it briefly on this list. I have since completely run out
> of time,
> and would love ot see this happen!
Lets make it happen!! :-)
>
> The basic idea was to use existing code (SharpZipLib) to
> access each
> of the documents contained in an archive as a stream for indexing.
> Then to
> use a URI to reference each one (something like
> tar://the/tar/file.tar?entry=the_contained_file).
Well.. really I haven't looked in to the actual implementation details,
just got it when I was archiving my backup. ;-)
>
> The problems I ran across seem trivial but caused me to run
> out
> of time. Basically the problem is this: It is easy to know the MIME
> type
> of the archive (tar or zip files for eaxmaple), but it gets a little
> tougher
> to know the MIME type of the contained documents. I ran across some
> memory
> corruption issues when trying to use the existing MIME type-sniffing
> functions
> ifrom gnome-vfs.
We need to see the possibility of identifying a MIME-type through URI or
sort of.. ??
> The problems were most likely due to my poor understanding of
> Marshalling in .NET,
> so others will probably have an easier go at it. Also, I noticed that
> the functions
> behave poorly when attempting to get the MIME type of a non-existing
> file (i.e. a
> file which is not actually on disk, but rather is an "entry" in an
> archive).
hmmm... have to really dig into it.. let me do it and "bug" the list
with questions.. ;-)
> I can try
> to find the C code I wrote to test the functions if someone is
> interested.
Yes. I am interested!!
>
> Indexing archives would be great, even for archives which are
> not mail attachements.
>
Yes.. but at the same time, we have to make sure that we don't choke the
CPU!!
Thanks,
V. Varadhan.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]