Re: PATCH: foobar clock widget
- From: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>
- To: "Dennis M. Cranston" <dennis_cranston yahoo com>
- Cc: Mikael Hallendal <micke codefactory se>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: PATCH: foobar clock widget
- Date: 17 Dec 2001 10:59:02 +0000
On Fri, 2001-12-14 at 16:32, Dennis M. Cranston wrote:
> Mikael -
>
> Thanks for your suggestions. But, I have to disagree. The menu panel is
> a different type of panel. It always contains Applications, Actions,
> the Clock, and Tasks. The goal of the menu panel is to provide average
> users with a familiar panel layout. If you don't like the menu panel
> then you shouldn't use it. You could replace it with an edge panel at
> the top of your screen. BTW, you stated that the clock applet is better
> than the hard coded clock in the foobar. But, who is the clock applet
> better for? I don't think it is better for the average user.
I think I have to agree with Mikael here. In terms of a usability
experience [1], it it somewhat inconsistent, especially since you can
*only* have one menu panel and you can't move it around at all. I think
a better situation would be to remove the menu panel, and if the user
needs it, create a 'menu panel' out of a menu applet, a clock applet and
a tasklist applet. This can easily be done since the new panel will
start using schemas, and we can easily setup a default panel which will
be just fine for the average user.
See ya,
Glynn :)
[1] And I'm sure hoping that someone from the usability side of things
will jump in here :)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]