Re: ten maybe-possibly-fairly easy-fix bugs for new hacking volunteers

["R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>]

On 20 Apr 2002, Bill Haneman wrote:

> On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 16:40, Luis Villa wrote:
> > The a11y team needs to get together with wipro and I, then... there have
> > been a number of these types of dual-keybinding bugs filed and no one
> > has commented adversely on any of them until Jacob did (which I admit I
> > missed last night when I was making the list up.)
> 
> Hi:  (CC-ing release team)
> 
> Yes - and Abel, I didn't mean to say that the fix is
> definitely 'bad', just that I'd like to see a second opinion.

OK, left it as it is then.

> Also the change to the accessibility capplet should probably 
> be filed as a separate bugzilla bug with Calum included in the
> interest list, otherwise interested parties won't know when 
> labels and keybindings change.

Done, bugzilla #79323. This is worse than the #75248, and
demonstrates the 'cycling' of items using same keybinding
is a bit untrustworthy. If it's simple cases like the same
keybinding appearing twice in the same menu, then it's fine;
but if another item goes somewhere else, then it's quite
unexpected. Not gtk's fault though.

Abel

PS CC'ed desktop-devel-list and removed gnome-love


> This is a UI change too, so I'm sure there is a process that
> should be followed before applying it since it could invalidate
> documentation and screenshots...
> 
> Best regards,
> -Bill

-- 
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc