Re: GNOME personas

[Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas urgent rug ac be>]

> Hi Rodney,
> 
> The point I was trying to make was that this is how I proposed GNOME handle
> the style guide issue back in 1998.  Havoc Pennington and the other
> meatheads on the list at that time threw a fit over it, claiming that the
> style guide should be formed by a friggin 50,000 person committee instead of
> airing the ideas infront of a small control group that represented the user
> public.

If we all signed some waiver that explained how you invented every bright 
desktop idea ever thought of since 1995, would THAT make you stop posting 
shit like this ?

It'd give me a sense of future, imagining how my kids will yell at me
"Dad, I don't wanna hear your stupid Bowie J. Poag story again !!!" when I 
try to explain to them how we came to have the goodness of a GNOME 10.2 
desktop.

I think all of us already KNOW you have an ego the size 
of Africa, so there's no need to keep making that obvious.

Thomas

 -- 

The Dave/Dina Project : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
Ik voel me zo door jou verlaten
als een zoebox zonder platen
<-*- thomas  (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, the best radio on the Internet - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/