Re: Continued .. Moving up the chain: Breaking gnome 2.0 alpha builds

[Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc linuxweasel com>]

On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 15:01, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Chris Chabot wrote:
> 
> > Also, gtk+ and other packages fail when the redhat's default gtk-doc is 
> > installed. Since upgrading it and all the tools is not a simple job, the 
> > 'easy' solution seems to be `rpm -e gtk-doc`
> 
> So, is it warranted to have a new release of gtk-doc within a few
> days?

Only if someone can figure out why it works for some packages, but not
for others.  I suspect that it's some difference in the makefiles, but
haven't had time to investigate further.  I'm not sure it's a gtk-doc
problem.
	Greg

-- 
Portland, Oregon, USA.