Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
- From: Chipzz <chipzz ULYSSIS Org>
- To: Bruce Robert Pocock <brpocock 10east com>
- Cc: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Christian Rose <menthos menthos com>, Dave Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>, <nautilus-list gnome org>, <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 03:58:44 +0200 (CEST)
On 1 Jul 2002, Bruce Robert Pocock wrote:
> From: Bruce Robert Pocock <brpocock 10east com>
> Subject: Re: Reducing the number of special uris in gnome
[Snipped stuff about MacOS]
I think this is all basically a non-issue. What may be an issue is the
number of binaries in $prefix/bin... Do all the capplets (yes I know I
shouldn't use that word) really have to go there? Can't we put them some
place else? Yes this would break people who manually start the capplets,
they'ld have to type in the complete path, but apart from that I don't
think anything else would break, if we changed the .desktop files.
Same comment for gconfd-2, can't we put it in $prefix/lib or something,
nobody should start it manually anyway, it's started by libgconf, and
that can be changed too...
Kind regards,
Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
Chipzz ULYSSIS Org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]