Re: Fifth-toe list (was Re: [Usability]thoughts on ui-review for fifth toe)
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- Cc: Jamin Philip Gray <jgray writeme com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fifth-toe list (was Re: [Usability]thoughts on ui-review for fifth toe)
- Date: 12 Jul 2002 02:06:59 +1000
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 01:52, Luis Villa wrote:
> This discussion (what is in fifth toe) needs to be on a wider list than
> usability@; please strip usability@ from the replies to this particular
> branch of the thread.
Hmm, yeah, I posted my commentary to the release team / usability list
(didn't even realise usability was there, oops).
> This list generally looks OK to me, but a question: who gets to veto
> things from this list with a 'this is not up to GNOME standards' note?
After discussion with d-d-l and the hackers involved, then I think Jamin
(as Fifth Toe dude) and the release team.
> For example, to the best of my knowledge, xchat will never conform to
> the HIG, and Rachel has had no time to do anything with metatheme to
> bring it up to the stability/functionality standards we've set in the
> core release. Do those things matter for fifth toe?
Yeah. Less so, but they definitely do. Fifth Toe should be a
demonstration of the best GNOME applications around, so everything
involved should make an attempt to come up to GNOME standards. (Puts
GIMP in an odd position though...)
> Relatedly,
Oh, I like that one.
> do we want to include only 'stable' releases of gtk2-ported
> apps? i.e., should gimp be in if our choice is a gtk1.4 version or an
> unstable devel version? Or should we just leave it out until it is
> stable?
I'd say definitely side with 2.x apps only for subsequent releases. :-)
- Jeff
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]