Re: nautilus vs. gnome-settings-daemon "race"
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: nautilus vs. gnome-settings-daemon "race"
- Date: 12 Jul 2002 16:35:52 -0400
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 17:33, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 21:24, jacob berkman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 17:01, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 20:30, jacob berkman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 16:20, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > > Gnome-session knows if it's about to start nautilus or not, no ? If so,
> > > > > you could add some way to delay g-s-d's bg application.
> > > >
> > > > did you look at the patch? this is what it does, except that g-s-d
> > > > doesn't delay it, it just never does it.
> > >
> > > My bad, didn't see the patch. But what if nautilus isn't started for
> > > some reasons ? For example, the user has removed nautilus, or nautilus
> > > crashes on startup.
> >
> > the user can't remove nautilus - gsm has already read the list of apps
> > it's going to start. there's no way for the user to axe things at this
> > point.
>
> So if the admin removed Nautilus in between two of the user's sessions,
> it won't work, right ?
oh, you mean uninstall it. yes this is the only bad case - however the
sysadmin should provide a migration path which would work here.
- jacob
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]