Re: Control Center Behavior



IMO the ideal solution would treat .directory specified images as
emblems. Dunno if that is even remotely possible. That way they're still
obviously folders, but you can tell they're special.

-seth

On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 10:01, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 15:41, bordoley msu edu wrote:
> > If this is done to the preferences: scheme shouldn't it be done to all 
> > schemes for ui consistency???
> 
> It should probably be done for a lot of the schemes in fact. I'm just
> asking if it's what Seth and the rest of the usability people want.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> > Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> said:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 13:44, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > I agree with you Seth on the issues raised. We need explanations.
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 06:06, Seth Nickell wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 16:27, Mark Finlay wrote:
> > > > <snip>
> > > > > > 2. It has sepporate panes for launchers and settings which is much 
> > more
> > > > > > intuitive and eliminates confusion and disoriatation caused by the
> > > > > > nautilus version.
> > > > > 
> > > > > What in particular is confusing and disorienting about the Nautilus
> > > > > version for you? 
> > > > > 
> > > > > One problem I see with the Nautilus version is that its not immediately
> > > > > obvious which items are folders and which are actual preference pages.
> > > > > This is a serious problem. Ideally what would happen is that images for
> > > > > folders would not replace the folder icon, but would work as emblems. As
> > > > > a short term fix we should probably figure out how to disable icons for
> > > > > folders when browsing that URI in Nautilus. Folder icons may not be as
> > > > > pretty, but they're more useful.
> > > > 
> > > > This I think I know how to do, as I browsed that code yesterday.
> > > > 
> > > > in libnautilus-private/nautilus-directory-async.c in
> > > > should_look_for_dot_directory_file, remove the "preferences:" scheme
> > > > from the scheme for which it should look for a .directory. That should
> > > > fix the problem here (although I didn't test).
> > > 
> > > It tested it, and it works :)
> > > 
> > > http://hadess.net/files/shots/18-07-2002.2.jpg
> > > 
> > > Is this something I should commit ?
> > > 
> > > Cheers
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > /Bastien Nocera
> > > http://hadess.net
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> /Bastien Nocera
> http://hadess.net





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]