Re: bug status

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 01:51, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 05:32, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 22:58, bordoley msu edu wrote:
> > > If this doesn't work I have a feeling we'll get alot of bad press over it...
> > 
> > Considering how few duplicates of that bug have been filed, I doubt it. 
> Or it could be that we have successfully marketed the 2.0.0 critical bug
> list so most people where aware that the bug was already filed and being
> worked on :)

Quite possible, though this bug far predates any 2.0.0 list marketing,
or even the existence of such a list :) 

> 
> > For the record, despite how bad the bug is, I'm a little uncomfortable
> > putting in this big a change this late [assuming that it is, indeed, a
> > big change :) 
> 
> If it turns out to do some bad mojo we just roll it  back like the
> terminal i18n bug.

I'm just worried about the amount of time we have for testing and a
rollback. If everyone promises to bang on it the hour after it is
checked in I guess I'm cool with it :)
Luis