RE: Gnome 2.2 suggestions
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: Gnome 2.2 suggestions
- Date: 26 Sep 2002 11:39:42 +0200
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 11:07, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 04:35, Craig Williamson (ENZ) wrote:
> > Thanks Jeff,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments.
> >
> > Some of the package programs out there are pretty old and ugly.
> > Mandrake 9.0's Installer GUI is a prime example. It is still based on
> > GTK1 (as far as I know) and is basically butt ugly. If you guys took
> > the chance to unify package management into a single entity (i.e.
> > distribution independant) it would move Linux forward as a desktop.
> > Take the best out of the distibution package management tools
> > (embrace). Unify and modify the code to a common easy to use user
> > interface (extend). Then when the package is complete, create some
> > buzz around the community and commercial companies (excite) that a
> > unified gnome-based installer is available for general consumption and
> > can be used as part of a distributions offering. Especially focus on
> > the commercial companies because they need to have single reliable
> > installer.
>
> It is very difficult to make a distribution-independent packaging tool
> -- how would it examine the package database? On RedHat it can use
> librpm, on Debian it needs to use libapt...
>
that's exactly what libredcarpet (in GNOME CVS) does, which is to have a
wrapper for the underlying packaging system. And Red Carpet just uses
that to work on all supported platforms.
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]