Re: REMINDER: GEP-2 discussion end date

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Calum Benson <calum benson sun com> writes: 
> I agree that's probably going to be the more
> controversial/time-consuming/fun bit :)  While it's probably reasonable
> to have some of that discussion now though (unless we want to push out
> the GEP-2 deadline again-- do we?), we presumably shouldn't be making
> any UI decisions until GEP-2 is agreed, or allowing any UI discussion to
> influence the contents of GEP-2 towards a particular design in the
> remaining discussion period.
> 

Oops, I forgot that this is a requirements GEP. You're right.

So I have to say it, we're missing this requirement:

 - the dialog itself has to be simple, clean, and usable.

Havoc