Re: that darned accessibility capplet
- From: Jody Goldberg <jody gnome org>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org, earl johnson sun com
- Subject: Re: that darned accessibility capplet
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:22:25 -0400
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 03:06:00PM +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Earl Johnson said:
> >
> > This is re-run feedback from me but I think the capplet should be a
> > tabbed pane with 2 tabs - one tab for StickyKeys, MouseKeys, and
> > ToggleKeys; the other a keyboard response tab containing RepeatKeys,
> > BounceKeys, and SlowKeys.
Remember that 'RepeatKeys' is _not_ part of gnome accessX. That is
handled by the keyboard capplet.
Having such a split would definitely go a long way towards easing
the massive crowding.
> > Window's added an additional feature along these lines that
> > AccessX never had - it posts a popup the first time any feature
> > is invoked from the keyboard and asks the user then if they
> > want to fully disable keyboard accessibility. This would be a
> > good thing to see added to the GNOME desktop.
>
> Yeah, that does sound cool, and it will help prevent weird but reports
> ;-)
Do we need to differentiate between another app enabling things,
and the magic keystrokes ? Its easy to catch the change (we already
do). However, there is no clear cut way to know what caused it. Eg
even when the settings-daemon changes things the X server notifies
it that the state changed.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]