Re: Killing views [Was: Dealing with files in Gnome]
- From: Julien Olivier <julo altern org>
- To: Ali Akcaagac <aliakc web de>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Killing views [Was: Dealing with files in Gnome]
- Date: 02 Apr 2003 14:27:01 +0200
> But that's the point!
>
> Konqueror's UI elements are not crippled. Basically Konqueror is nothing else
> than just a Window frame and nothing else. Without KHTML embedded as KParts
> (?) it wouldn't even act as a Webbrowser. All those KParts thingies are what
> gives it the powers e.g. act as SQL query analyzer, Pop3 email browser,
> Filemanager, Webbrowser, Movieplayer, PDF viewer and so on.
>
Yes, I know that. But that's only theory. In practice, konqueror IS
crippled. For example, it has a location bar, previous/next icons which
come from the fact that it may be a web navigator. It has a "print" icon
which is useless when browsing your files etc...
Of course, that's just my personal opinion and I also feel that Nautilus
has herited some UI crippling from the time where it was a web
browser...
Now if you say that GNOME needs a plugin-embedder comparable to
konqueror, why not but then I need a file manager that does what its
name claims: manage files.
I just don't like hybrid apps because their ployvalence is often
compensated by bad UI design.
> Real live scenario:
> -------------------
(snip)
About burn://
Isn't it possible to easily build a standalone app that would simply
embed the burn:// view ?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]