Older windows tried to do something like that (support for edit/play/... in addition to open), and this was a terrible mess to use. Let's first get a good UI to handle Open/Open with, and then let's add Edit/Play/Whatever starting from that if that seems worth it. Christophe Le lun 08/12/2003 à 20:04, John McCutchan a écrit : > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:14:25PM +0000, Calum Benson wrote: > > I guess the issue is whether that's *too* specific... I could just as > > easily be wanting to edit a file in Mozilla, or view it in emacs. "Open" > > handily covers both scenarios, without the UI appearing too > > presumptious. > > With emacs it is an editor so of course you would say "Edit". So if > a program offers an editing feature the verb would be edit. With > mozilla it has a composer component that allows editing. I guess a > better menu would be: > > View with Epiphany > View with Galeon > View with Mozilla > Edit with Emacs > Edit with Vim > Edit with Text Editor > Edit with Bluefish > Edit with Mozilla Composer > > John > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=