Re: 2.2 was a *five* month process [Was: 2.3 Proposed Features]

[Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>]

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 19:59, Christian Meyer wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:56:24 +1100
> Jeff Waugh wrote:
> 
> > I'd just like to point out that the 7.5 months figure is not correct. The
> > "official" 2.2 development period ran from around September 6th to February
> > 5th. That's *FIVE* months almost to the day.
> 
> oopsy ;-)
>  
> > The reason why we had a shorter development period is because we spent a lot
> > of time on the three post-2.0 point releases.
> 
> Did we actually suffer from that?
> Sounds to me that from now on, there won't be any 2.2.x releases anymore ;-)

That must have been a typo. No more 2.0.x releases, but there's
definitely things to do in 2.2.x.

-- 
Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>