Re: 2.3 Feature Request: Inactive toolbar icons
- From: Rodney Dawes <dobey free fr>
- To: Bob Smith <bob thestuff net>
- Cc: Ben FrantzDale <bfrantzdale hmc edu>, shaihulud supereva it, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.3 Feature Request: Inactive toolbar icons
- Date: 06 Feb 2003 18:00:05 -0500
I just prefer it not being like every other single desktop environment
on the face of the planet. It gets old. :)
-- dobey
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:45, Bob Smith wrote:
> Only thing I can think of is maybe it looks better on non 32/24 bit
> displays? If it was done for that reason, maybe it can lookup what bit
> depth the display is in?
>
> On 6 Feb 2003, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 07:48, shaihulud supereva it wrote:
> > > Hi, i've a suggestion for a new feature for the 2.3 branch.
> > > I'd like inactive toolbar icons look's like the screenshot i've made.
> > > The screenshot compare a Kde toolbar and a Gnome Toolbar.
> > > I'd like to have something like the Kde Toolbars.
> > >
> >
> > For future reference, it's usually better to post a URL to a picture
> > rather than sending the picture itself, for bandwidth reasons.
> >
> > As for the idea. I totally agree. It makes me wonder, though, if there
> > was a particular reason for doing it the way it's done now, given how
> > easy it should be to grey the icon out properly.
> >
> > --Ben
> >
--
"So I gave up on that, and tried to install gstreamer. Get this. Their
propose ``solution'' for distributing binaries on Red Hat systems? They
point you at an RPM that installs apt, the Debian package system! Yeah,
that's a good idea, I want to struggle with two competing packaging
systems on my machine just to install a single app." -- jwz
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]