RE: 2.4: System Tools - Please try them


please, have a look at

does this fit in your idea of services tool? at least it does in mine
:-P. I did this modification to runlevel-admin in this evening, and
still needs lots of love, but when it's ready I'll commit it

please! any feedback? :-)


PD: the intelligent priority support is still a TODO :-)

El mar, 03-06-2003 a las 20:15, Seth Nickell escribió:


> Most people don't care about the bootup sequence. They care about
> whether the service is running or not. A single checkbox would do just
> fine. It would be especially nice if when you checked the box, the
> service actually started and when you unchecked it, the service stopped
> (and of course, this also effects the "runlevel" settings... however
> RH's setup tool does it). It would be even cooler if there was some way
> to check if the service was running (for services which support this,
> like atalk, httpd, etc) and only show the checkbox as checked if it was.
> This gets rid of the distinction between "service runs at bootup" and
> "service is running".
> -Seth

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]