Re: 2.4 Proposed Modules - battfink

[Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>]

Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com> writes:

> Right, battfink tries to use ACPI, and then falls back to APM. Most X
> servers should have the DPMS extension, but obviously not all systems
> have APM - the configure *should* check for the existance, and not show
> the battery part of the UI, but I haven't checked this.

Do you mean configure at build time?  This has to be run time so that
binaries can work on multiple computers.

Jumping in without looking,
-Jonathan