Re: Adding ATs to the menus

[Michael Toomim <toomim OCF Berkeley EDU>]

Christian Rose wrote:
> I also think "accessibility" is a very wellknown term these
> days, and would probably be so even more for the target group of users,
> so it would probably be bad to lose that recognition effect.

I don't think the issue was that the target users wouldn't understand 
it, but that the non-target (the *other* 97% of) users wouldn't 
understand it.  The term "accessibility" doesn't seem to have gotten a 
significant foothold in the mainstream english lexicon yet.

I personally think that "Universal Access" is a much more "accessible" 
term for mainstream users.  "Accessibility" alone is too vague without 
prior knowledge, I believe...  I could imagine it standing for "remote 
login services", "physical input devices", "user/permissions 
management", "graphical user interface", "screensaver lockout", "gdm", 
or anything that has to do with being able to access a computer.