Re: migrating to new backend format

[Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas apestaart org>]

On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 22:54, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:48, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:29, Chipzz wrote:
> > > but ~/.gconf26 is _UGLY_ ...
> > 
> > Only way out of that is to avoid extending the format. None of the three
> > options get you out of it.
> > 
> > We may be able to think of a nicer name than .gconf26.
> 
> What was the original reason for not putting it in .gnome (or .gnome2)
> ?  It could just be move there, since that'll be different location, and
> it seems (to me, anyways) more correct.

It's not gnome-only.

Thomas


Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
Oh what do you do
when you feel like
you're living a lie
<-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*->
URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/