Le sam 27/09/2003 à 06:49, Havoc Pennington a écrit : > Hi, > > The new gconf backend I wrote a year ago seems to use about 50% of the > memory of the current one and I think Mark discovered that it's faster > CPU-wise also. Switching should thus save several megabytes desktop > footprint and some noticeable app startup and login time. How can adventurous people (if any) test this new backend ? Christophe > > I didn't really realize it was noticeably better, since I rewrote it > just as a code cleanup not for any performance reason and never > profiled. Now that we know there's a real advantage to it though I think > it'd be worth changing over for GNOME 2.6. So I plan to do that at some > point if nobody screams. > > The new backend passes the test suite and I know at least a couple > people have tried using it. I'll use it for my desktop for a few days > before switching it over in CVS. > > Should be an entirely user-transparent change, the on-disk format is > unaffected. > > Havoc > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=