Re: dbus and GNOME 2.8
- From: Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- To: jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: dbus and GNOME 2.8
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 11:34:52 -0700
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 07:16:27PM +0100, jamie wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 19:11, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 07:08:59PM +0100, jamie wrote:
> > > > does it all much much faster with much less resource overhead than any
> > > > "big" RDBMS I know of, embedded or not.
> > >
> > > Faster? Using variants for types I doubt that very much. It might
> > > outperform Postgres but I would be very surprised if it beat firebird.
> >
> > sqllite is typeless. Everything is text from what I remember. So
> > the type system is very simple.
>
> Yes but not efficient. (Typeless = variants).
>
> EG in Firebird, I would *Always* define a table with a primary key that
> was of type integer. Why? because integers are the quickest to sort.
> SQLite allows you to enter a string into such a field so how cant it be
> efficient?
http://www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/datatypes.html
The integer primary key is the exception to the rule.
sri
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]