Re: bug-buddy branched for 2.6
- From: Fernando Herrera <fherrera onirica com>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: bug-buddy branched for 2.6
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:12:28 +0200
Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 09:34:07AM +0800, James Henstridge escribió:
>>Should this be xml-rpc instead?
>>
>>
>Given that submitting bugs to bugzilla is pretty simple and
>standardised, is there any benefit to using a non-standard bugzilla
>feature here? All you really need to do is acquire a login cookie
>(going to /query.cgi?goAheadAndLogin=1 will do that), then do a post to
>/post_bug.cgi.
I think interating with a web application via xml-rpc is a cleaner
way than manually do what a browser does.
I think xml-rpc is on redhat bugzilla. Luis do you know if there
is any plan about integrating xml-rpc stuff in bugzilla mainstream?
Salu2
--
Fernando Herrera de las Heras
Onírica: análisis, diseño e implantación de soluciones informáticas
http://www.onirica.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]