Re: Evolution 2.0 and GNOME 2.6

[Xavier Ordoquy <xordoquy wanadoo fr>]

On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 01:45, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
> > Well, the problem isn't as serious really as described.  Distributions are
> > going to add evolution themselves.  Just because we don't have it as
> > official doesn't mean it won't be in there.
> 
> Slackware doesn't include it for political(!) and technical reasons (however
> I know that Pat would include it if it was part of Gnome).

This is pointless. If so, Gnome should also include
Gnumeric, dia, mrproject, openoffice, anjuta, gnucash ?

--