Re: Vino: proposal for inclusion in GNOME 2.8

[Dave Camp <dave novell com>]

Shouldn't we be measuring on "usefulness to gnome" rather than
"integration with gnome", where integration is just one way to make it
more useful?

-dave

On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 16:03 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 05:51 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="Luis Villa">
> > 
> > > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 20:40 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > > > perhaps its useful to get this in 2.8.
> > > 
> > > why?
> > 
> > It's bloody useful, even the way it is at the moment. Plus, wider testing,
> > and ability to compete in the feature paralysis review stakes.
> 
> But given that (as far as I can see) there is basically no gnome
> integration at the moment, why is this more relevant to GNOME than, say,
> X? When it is tightly tied to gdm, session, etc. it seems obviously
> relevant, but not until then.
> 
> Luis
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list