Re: Proposed: gnome-system-tools
- From: Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Proposed: gnome-system-tools
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:55:02 +0100 (BST)
--- Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 01:30, Jeff
Waugh wrote:
> > <quote who="Havoc Pennington">
> >
> > > Reiterate
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-June/msg00161.html
> >
> > Is that "should not go in until these issues are resolved", or a reminder
> > that we really desperately need to resolve these issues? :-)
> >
>
> Two points:
>
> 1. Anything end-user oriented should be sucked into control center and
> designed top-down as part of control center, not kept separate.
>
This equally applies to admin tools, with the single difference that instead of
control center, you would use a different module. It should still be top down
design not graphical eye-candy around modifying this or that configuration file.
> If there are tools targeted toward *admins* we should consider those as
> a separate module and the interaction design should be done with admin
> as audience.
>
> So "date and time" should probably be in the control center. "Boot
> loader" is an admin thing, or just "geek power tools"; same for
> "runlevel."
>
boot loader and runlevels should probably be unified to "startup".
but theer shoudl really be more of a design to it all
>
> Havoc
>
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]