Re: Plans for 2.8 - GNOME Managed Language Services?

On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 14:35, Mike Kestner wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 13:19, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > Right now I think some people are arguing to block Java in favor of Mono
> > or sticking to C/C++/Python
> Actually, I think the argument is to allow java via mono, not to block
> java in favor of mono.  Maybe you meant jvm, though.  JVM is the
> technology that would block us from using other choices.

JVM vs. Mono runtime is the accurate way to put it, fair enough.

A partially orthogonal question is the class library set - Classpath,


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]