On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 23:46 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: > On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 08:08 -0700, Shahms King wrote: > > <snip> > > > number of reasons, it doesn't make sense to have any screensaver showing > > on any display which isn't actually visible. It centralizes user > > Yeah, this is one of the things I was kind of getting it. It seems like > it might be a little hard to work out which screens are visible or not > though, remember we have XTerms and remote sessions to deal with. > > --d I've written a little fast user switching applet, which includes a static lib with a couple nice GObjects to handle GDM interaction (screens, users [w/ face pixbufs], etc.). It'd be trivial to copy/paste that static lib, the only thing that's not working properly is gdmcomm_check(), which I haven't updated yet. http://esco.mine.nu/archive/2004/05/05/user-selector-applet-005.html -- Peace, Jim Cape http://ignore-your.tv "We still name our military helicopter gunships after victims of genocide. Nobody bats an eyelash about that: Blackhawk. Apache. And Comanche. If the Luftwaffe named its military helicopters Jew and Gypsy, I suppose people would notice." -- Noam Chomsky, "Propaganda and the Public Mind"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part