Re: Polypaudio action plan
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Polypaudio action plan
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 13:19:42 +1100
<quote who="Colin Walters">
> 1) Remove all usage of esound from libgnome and associated applications,
> and replace it with GStreamer where possible
GStreamer is currently included in the Desktop suite, not the Platform, so
this would mean either: a) GStreamer should be proposed for the Platform, or
b) we consider GStreamer an external dependency, outside the scope of GNOME.
> 1a) Where not possible (gnome_audio_connection_get), a compile-time
> option is provided for systems desiring esound compatibility
So, is the proposed "always return -1" change sufficiently unexpected that
it would have a detrimental affect on semantic API compatibility? If not,
are there any further reasons to be uncomfortable doing it?
> 2) Enhance GStreamer to provide a sample ding caching abstraction
> 3) Drop esound from the official platform; or perhaps "strongly
> deprecate"
We'd have to deprecate it only.
> 4) Make GStreamer the only sound API for GNOME; official
> Platform/Desktop modules are not allowed to require anything else
> 5) Give a link in the release notes to Polypaudio and/or esound for
> systems in need of a sound daemon
> 6) Participate in dancing in the streets due to demise of esound
This seems like a good enough short term plan, but I'd be surprised if this
doesn't come up again in the future. :-)
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2005: Canberra, Australia http://linux.conf.au/
"Orphaned farm-boy hero helps save world against bad-guys, begins a
journey of self-discovery, and makes interesting friends. Passable." -
Andrew Bennetts on Star Wars
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]