Re: moving to dbus 0.3x asthe target version for G2.12 [was Re: DBus in G2.12]

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

On 6/10/05, John (J5) Palmieri <johnp redhat com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 10:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > [Moving this off r-t to a broader group that might have more feedback on this :)
> >
> > On 6/10/05, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, June 10, 2005 15:22, Ross Burton said:
> > > > I think the release team need to make a statement about what version of
> > > > DBus is to be used for any code which can use DBus.  At present I
> > > > believe gnome-vfs and HAL in CVS are using the DBus 0.3x API, whereas
> > > > nautilus-cd-burn is still using 0.2x.  As these cannot be easily used at
> > > > the same time, this needs to be resolved one way or another.
> > >
> > > Good point. I think that the distributors that will ship 2.12 will use
> > > DBus 0.3x. Going with the DBus 0.3x API looks like the more sensible
> > > solution to me. Is there any reason to stay with the 0.2x API?
> >
> > Yeah, I don't know of any reason not to standardize on 0.3x- most
> > things have already ported AFAICS. d-d-l, anyone object to requiring
> > everyone to move to 0.3x? (I'm assuming no, but...)
>
> I have patches for all core GNOME modules and if they aren't already in
> CVS it means they were just not applied yet. 

Are they in bugzilla? :)

> If anyone else needs help
> porting their stuff just let me know.  I need to make a new DBus release
> pretty soon.  I will do so before I go to Germany next week.

OK, that settles that. 0.3x it is.

Luis (executively deciding ;)