Re: new gnome-common release?

[Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>]

Hi Bill,
	If you're going to reply to a digest, please make some effort - e.g.
snip the mail and change the comment ...

On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 10:34 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:

> >I think most people agree that gnome-common isn't something that should
> >be packaged (at least that's true for Fedora/Red Hat distros), as gnome-
> >common is a development tool, to build from CVS. I think it should be
> >removed altogether from the FTP site, so as not to create confusion.
> >  
> >
> I disagree.  There are folks who still prefer to build from tarballs.  
> And for many distros, tarballs are the preferred base for creating RPMs, 
> so as long as gnome-common is required for a build, there should be 
> releases for it IMO.

	gnome-common isn't required to build tarballs, only from CVS.

Mark.