On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 07:55 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > søn, 16 07 2006 kl. 23:33 -0500, skrev Jason D. Clinton: > > While you provided a fine run down of arguments, I believe you forgot a > vital one, Mono can be optimized, we can cut down ressource consumption, > we can indeed do better - we cannot however make C development as fast > development in C#, nor as fun. Twice the memory consumption is as I > understand it not the lowest common denominator but rather the worst > case under the new garbage collector - but nobody has provided hard > numbers for the highly contested ressource use yet. This IS an interesting argument but this is the first time I have seen it. But, perhaps I missed it in my review; if I did, I appologize. It wasn't out of malice for Mono.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part