Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails

[Mike Kestner <mkestner novell com>]

On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:21 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:

> > gtk-sharp-2.10.0 would keep glib-sharp, pango-sharp, atk-sharp,
> > gdk-sharp, gtk-sharp, glade-sharp, and gtkdotnet.  I would propose this
> > altered package for inclusion in the Bindings release set.
> 
> That seems a lot nicer.
> 
> I am, however, slightly concerned that this would force people to depend
> on libglade even when we have a libglade replacement in GTK+. The C, C
> ++, Python, Java, and Perl users will be able to rewrite their
> applications so that they don't need libglade on the system.

glade-sharp is an optional build.  We're not forcing anyone to put it on
their systems.

-- 
Mike Kestner <mkestner novell com>