Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails
- From: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- To: "Alex Graveley" <alex beatniksoftware com>
- Cc: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Putting the 'Mono debate' back on the rails
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:44:13 -0600
On 7/26/06, Alex Graveley <alex beatniksoftware com> wrote:
This sounds great, and will help Gtk# t be used by many more people!
Sorry to add confusion, but how does this help the Tomboy discussion?
I'm using gnome-sharp and gconf-sharp. And hopefully the panel APIs in
the future (there is a crasher bug currently, so I'm using a local copy).
Would we add gnome-sharp as a soft dependency if Tomboy is included,
similar to e.g. libsoup for Evolution?
Pending the gtk# discussion elsewhere, the idea would be to treat it
the same as python -- stable bindings of platform modules in the
bindings release, unstable bindings of desktop (and possibly even some
platform) modules in the desktop release, and desktop modules allowed
to depend on either of those two sets of bindings.
In short, no further work required of you in regards to this
particular issue. :-)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]