Re: Proposal to add Orca to GNOME 2.16

[Sri Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>]

So there's been no comment on this (or I must have missed it).  Are we
considering Orca for GNOME 2.16[1]?

sri


[1] I'm assuming this is the time to propose new modules.  Although it
seems kind of early to me.

On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:21 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
> Hi All:
> 
> We (the Orca team) have been very busy the past few weeks and would like
> to provide more status of where we are with respect to the proposal to
> include Orca in GNOME 2.16.  I believe we have implemented the missing
> features in Orca that are present in Gnopernicus, and we've also done a
> fair amount of stability and testing work.  
> 
> We've also broached the subject of including Orca in GNOME 2.16 on
> orca-list gnome org   The discussion thread can be found here:
> 
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2006-June/msg00002.html
> 
> We've received positive feedback thus far (public and private),
> including the following message from Baum, the maintainer of
> Gnopernicus:
> 
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2006-June/msg00004.html
> 
> as well as the following from the Ubuntu accessibility team:
> 
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orca-list/2006-June/msg00012.html
> 
> I believe we are on track here, and we are definitely committed to the
> effort.  With the exception of carrying on a discussion on
> desktop-devel-list gnome org, the proposal/acceptance process is still a
> mystery to me.  I'd like to make sure we are not missing something
> really big here, and I'm curious about what other barriers to adoption
> may exist for getting Orca into GNOME 2.16.  We will work hard to
> address the issues that arise.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Will
> (Orca project lead)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-- 
Sri Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>