Re: gnome desktop integration library

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

JP Rosevear wrote:
> The problem is, I've seen no unequivocal declaration about gtk+ and glib
> accepting these higher level abstractions, so perhaps matthias can
> comment, because historically this has not been the case and is a
> primary concern for me at least.

My perspective, step 1 is decide what is right, and step 2 is talk 
people into it.

I don't have reason to believe there's a fundamental disagreement with 
the gtk maintainers, though. Most of the "kinds of dependency" I listed 
in that other mail are already used in gtk.

Havoc