Re: getting on a longer release cycled

["David Trowbridge" <trowbrds gmail com>]

What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?

-David

On 9/7/06, Pat Suwalski <pat suwalski net> wrote:
> Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> > I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month release
> > schedule of Gnome to do a "major" release with a certain number of feature
> > that would involve possible infrastructure changes in the platform.
>
> I have been thinking about this as well, just from observing how "shit
> hits the fan" near the end of the cycle.
>
> I'd like to throw out a suggestion that perhaps GNOME should alternate
> on a six-month-twelve-month release cycle, regardless of "major release"
> or not. It might make planning a little more complicated, but I'm sure
> it would be appreciated by developers and users alike.
>
> --Pat
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list