Re: GNOME 2.20.0 beta 1



On 8/16/07, Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no> wrote:
> tor, 16.08.2007 kl. 12.18 +0200, skrev Frederic Peters:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> >
> > > I'm still in the process of building the release and have uploaded the
> > > modulesets and versions file to the ftp server so far. Hit a few snags
> > > here and there so it has taken me longer than I wanted.
> >
> > gnome-suites-2.19.90.modules is missing tarballs for new modules, accerciser
> > and gnome-devel-docs,
> >
> >  <tarball id="gnome-devel-docs" version="2.19.1">
> >    <source href="http://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-devel-docs/2.19/gnome-devel-docs-2.19.1.tar.bz2 md5sum="6615ea643ec27c41f97858d874bc4eb8" size="818514"/>
> >    <branch/>
> >    <dependencies>
> >      <dep package="gnome-doc-utils"/>
> >    </dependencies>
> >  </tarball>
> >
> >  <tarball id="accerciser" version="0.1.90">
> >    <source href="http://download.gnome.org/sources/accerciser/0.1/accerciser-0.1.90.tar.bz2"; md5sum="043def58d64eb693c9b7c04c193c1f23" size="829834"/>
> >    <branch/>
> >    <dependencies>
> >      <dep package="pygtk"/>
> >      <dep package="gnome-python"/>
> >      <dep package="gnome-python-desktop"/>
> >      <dep package="libglade"/>
> >      <dep package="at-spi"/>
> >    </dependencies>
> >  </tarball>
> >
> Damn. Thanks for the heads up. Maybe we should add these manually for
> this release?

Yeah, that'd be easiest.  :-)  I should probably make the comment
about updating tarball-conversion.config[1] more prominent; it's too
easy to miss.


[1] 6th step of http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/MakingARelease



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]