Le mardi 26 juin 2007 à 10:43 +0300, Lucas Rocha a écrit : > Hi, > > 2007/6/26, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>: > > On 6/25/07, Lucas Rocha <lucasr gnome org> wrote: > > > 2007/6/25, Benoît Dejean <benoit placenet org>: > > > > > > I've always been around multiload_applet2. gnome-applets is a collection > > > > of applets and there are already sub-maintainer. I'd like to > > > > commit/work/etc on multiload but my patches are stalled on bugzilla. I > > > > don't want to be the maintainer of gnome-applets but i can surely handle > > > > multiload. Hey "chief" (davyd), would you promote me ? > > > > > > > > > to do to gnome-love list > > > > > > > > I don't think gnome-love works, there are many bugs marked HELPWANTED or > > > > assigned to gnome-love, i've never seen any being solved by someone > > > > coming out of the blue. > > > > > > You're wrong. > > > > How could he possibly be wrong? He didn't say that gnome-love didn't > > work or that no gnome-love bugs had been solved by new contributors, > > he said that he *thought* gnome-love didn't work and that he hasn't > > personally seen gnome-love bugs being solved by some new contributor. > > ;-) Who are they ? Where are they ? Bugzilla tells me that 102 gnome-love bugs have been closed this year. But i don't know which were closed by new contributors. gnome-love bugs should be easy improvements. But if a bug is not closed in less than a release cycle, then i understand that developers handle fix it themselve. Maybe i don't understand which bug are good candidate for gnome-love. -- Benoît Dejean GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/ LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=