Re: State of gvfs in Gnome 2.21

["Luis Villa" <luis tieguy org>]

On Feb 12, 2008 8:36 AM, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> Despite all the hard work, it doesn't look like the new Nautilus will be
> ready for GNOME 2.22 without regressions.
>
> Why aren't we talking about punting it until GNOME 2.23/24? We've never
> allowed this kind of thing before - punting would be entirely normal.

We once delayed a release for a gtk release which wasn't yet stable,
IIRC- the porting was too far along to revert the porting work in a
timely manner (which I'm guessing is also the case here) and the
regressions were too large to do a .0 (which also seems to be the case
here, though I haven't followed it closely.)

But agreed that the right thing to do is to delay the release rather
than release a .0 with substantial regressions (as I ranted on a bit
at my blog and on gnome-bugsquad.)

Luis