Re: Low memory hacks



On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net> wrote:
>
>  On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 14:02 +0000, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
>  <snip>
>
> > That is a saving of at least 3M in memory.
>  >
>  > The stripping of "unneeded" messages is good, and should happen at the
>  > package generation level (not in GNOME, or when creating tarballs).
>
>  You talk about memory savings, but do calculations based on file sizes.
>  That's doesn't work.

Aren't mo files mapped to memory?

Simos


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]