Re: JavaScript engines

[Robert Carr <carrr rpi edu>]

While this argument is somewhat counter to my "side" most of the
JavaScript extensions are actually quite nice, and will be implemented in 
WebKit.

==============Original message text===============
On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:52:46 EST "Kalle Vahlman" wrote:

2009/1/6 Johan Dahlin <johan gnome org>:
> Anyway, what subset of JS that's going to be used in the newest and fanciest
> web pages seems like a less than ideal criteria to use to select a
> javascript engine for GNOME. Instead we should compare what's available,
> which will help developers to write great applications *today*.

I'd much rather see a *less* extended JS engine in GNOME than adopt
the mess of engine-specific JS features that exists in the browser
world.

But I guess I'm just a day-dreamer ;)

-- 
Kalle Vahlman, zuh iki fi
Powered by http://movial.fiInteresting stuff at http://sandbox.movial.comSee also http://syslog.movial.fi_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
===========End of original message text===========