Re: Platform



2009/5/18 Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>:
>
> Whilst I'm a maintainer of GUPnP and think it's the best solution we
> have for interoperating with other UPnP devices (of which they are many
> in the wild), I really do think it's an ugly specification which hasn't
> had any recent development.  I also notice that Windows Vista includes
> something I've forgotten the name of which they basically call the
> successor to UPnP...
>

Perhaps you are referring to DPWS [1] or DLNA [2].
For the second there is a good implementation here [3]

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devices_Profile_for_Web_Services
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Living_Network_Alliance
[3] http://coherence.beebits.net/

-- 
Javier Jardón Cabezas


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]