Re: gnome-spidermonkey?
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: Frederic Crozat <fred crozat net>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Developers Mailing List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gnome-spidermonkey?
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:16:14 -0500
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Frederic Crozat <fred crozat net> wrote:
>
> Isn't that what xulrunner package is for ?
xulrunner *is* firefox, literally; the sources are identical. On
Fedora at least, Firefox is built using it, which means that if
there's say a security update for Firefox (which almost certainly is
really in xulrunner), then xulrunner needs to be updated, which could
possibly include JSAPI changes.
Basically, I want us to be decoupled from this; there are conceptually
actually 4 layers.
NSPR <- spidermonkey <- xulrunner <- firefox
Where "<-" is depends on. Right now at least Fedora ships like:
NSPR <- (spidermonkey xulrunner firefox)
Where () is "tightly coupled", meaning that gjs and gnome-shell are
tightly coupled to firefox.
Having a separate xulrunner as a project hasn't really worked - it's a
*huge*, enormous codebase. Spidermonkey on the other hand has always
nominally supported being built seprately; it has its own configure
script, etc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]