Re: Versioned symbols for 3.0?

[Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
<behdad esfahbod gmail com> wrote:

> If we autogenerate the version script, I think Matthias can be bribed into
> accepting it

Well, the arguments against symbol versioning have not really changed
since ca 2005, so we do we need to discuss this again ?

- It doesn't really work the same way on any other platform

- It can only version functions, we still have have unversioned types,
properties, signals, etc, etc.