Re: GSettings best practice



On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 17:15 +0100, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> Le dimanche 07 novembre 2010 à 10:57 -0500, Ryan Lortie a écrit :
> > We were sitting around at the Boston summit today (me, vuntz, tedg, and
> > pbor via IRC) noticing that we have a mix of people using /apps/gedit/
> > sort of paths and /org/gnome/evince/ sort of paths in GSettings.
> > 
> > We all prefer /org/gnome/evince/ type of paths.
>
> This was very quickly discussed with on the list, and nobody answered
> then except Matthias:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-June/msg00097.html
> 
> I was in favor of the org/gnome/something approach, but what would then
> happen to /desktop/ keys, which (as Matthias said in his reply) would be
> better kept separate? 

I think that org.gnome.desktop makes sense.

> And what about the migration now that both schemes
> are in use?

Uhm, yes.  :)  I think they're just going to have to migrate.  It should
be a relatively straight forward transition.

		--Ted

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]