Re: GNOME user survey 2011

[Florian Max <florian muellner gmail com>]

2011/8/1 Felipe Contreras <felipe contreras gmail com>

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Florian Müllner <fmuellner gnome org> wrote:
> 2011/8/1 Felipe Contreras <felipe contreras gmail com>
>>
>> Yes, but if a significant percentage of the people answer "not at
>> all", or "somewhat", then the survey would be a bit wasted, since now
>> you have to wait another year to ask in more detail.
>
> Of course the same argument applies if a significant percentage of people
> feels that GNOME has "too few" configuration options.

Indeed, which is why I say the question is not biased. Results can go
one way or the other.

Huh? How does the fact that a request to "add more options" is meaningless without specifying which options are (supposedly) missing have anything to do with the original question being biased?


Florian