Cantarell? (Was: Re: Planned GNOME Shell UI changes (was Re: String and UI Change Announcement))
- From: Allan Day <allanpday gmail com>
- To: Andrew Cowie <andrew operationaldynamics com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Cantarell? (Was: Re: Planned GNOME Shell UI changes (was Re: String and UI Change Announcement))
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:53:30 +0000
Given recent discussions regarding the use of this list, I'm unsure
whether I should be responding to this question here. That said, I do
want to ensure that people get answers to queries like this.
Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 12:33 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > * The default font will be changing to Cantarell
>
> Cantarell?
>
> If Cantarell is this, http://abattis.org/cantarell/ which says
>
> As my very first typeface design... designed for on-screen
> reading; in particular, reading web pages on an HTC Dream mobile
> phone ... font file currently contains 391 glyphs
>
> then at first glance it seems an odd choice.
>
> DejaVu serves us well with outstanding coverage across the Unicode space
> and one of the only fonts with complimentary Serif, Sans, and Sans Mono
> families. Do we need to replace it?
It's not a question of coverage; it's about style (though we need to use
fonts that have good coverage, of course). The visual style that has
been developed for GNOME 3 is one that aspires to be subtle and refined.
Stylistically, Cantarell accords with that in a way that DejaVu does
not. Another aim for GNOME 3 is to ensure that the new desktop is
visually distinctive. Cantarell is a better choice than DejaVu here,
too.
I'm really excited that we're using this new font for GNOME 3; it has a
really nice design and will give the new desktop an extra bit of
sophistication.
Allan
--
Blog: https://afaikblog.wordpress.com/
IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]