On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 17:43 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Colin > > The issue is not so much time as unreliability. I've tried to > address > some of those with jhbuild, but there are two major ones > remaining: > > 1) Building from unclean source tree - stale Makefiles, > leftover > binaries, etc. > 2) Our lack of multi-module continuous integration > > > > There should be a continuous build going on, and when it fails the > module owner should be informed that their module has failed and it > should be fixed, IMHO. You mean http://build.gnome.org/ and its per-module RSS feeds? Philip > I think a lot of people would thank us. > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part